This article really resonated with me. Growing up in a school
system, as diametrically different to the American education system as one
could imagine, I have no idea how our teachers were trained. What I do
remember, as early as kindergarten, is walking to our school library (in a single
file of course), and being allowed to check out as many books as we could carry
in our arms. What’s more, we could go back to the library at any time, and
check out more books as long as we returned the ones we had checked out. The
point I am trying to make here is that the main motivation of those multiple
trips was an abiding love of books that have lasted through hard times,
immigration, and across careers. In a nutshell, the author of this article
discusses her love of books and the importance of modelling the love for
reading in readers.
The salient point in this article is that students are
influenced by other readers i.e. their classmates, parents, and teachers. Reading
books, regardless of genre, just for the sheer pleasure of the book is
paramount in helping students grow. This growth takes a variety of different
forms as adults model “reading journals”, quotation notebooks, book
recommendations of their own. I thought that the second point was a
particularly brilliant idea; this is an idea that would especially appeal to
adolescent readers who need that element of ownership to buy into any
suggestion an adult makes. It is an idea that I want to try, both for myself
and for some of my students. It transforms reading from something one has to do
to something one wants to do. My thoughts go back to a young lady that I talked
to in the course of a risk assessment. She said she was “a quotes person” and
that “quotes made her feel better, gave her strength.” I want to go back to her
and give her a notebook and encourage her to read and write. It is a classic
example of how reading builds up resilience and academic achievement. In my
opinion, students and teachers alike, need resilience to survive the world of
education today. In addition, this text underscores the importance of building
a rapport with students though conversation. It is a refreshing departure from
an emphasis on techniques, standards, and guidelines. It brings the focus back
to the importance of human interaction and modelling the behaviors we want our
students to exhibit. In the final
analysis, literacy is not an exact science because it involves people and the
multiple variables they bring to the table. It is critical that teachers
remember the importance of the affective component as they lead their students
to become better readers.
Mitu,
ReplyDeleteSo many of the points you transacted with in this reading were ones that resonated with me as well. I believe that effective literacy instruction cannot be "packaged" or "programmed" because of the dynamics between teachers and students and how important their needs and interests and existing funds of knowledge are. All of these play a role in not only what we teach, but how, and what materials we use. I also agree that we need resilence because sometimes experiences in life is hard, but we can try again and we can build strength to overcome... Thanks,Dawn