The eighth chapter of the Routman text discusses the guiding
principles of teaching comprehension and well as the importance of helping
students peel away the layers of a text, early in their education. It
emphasizes that fluency should not be the sole focus of early childhood
education… rather forming connections with the text and developing critical
thinking skills should be at the forefront of instruction from the early
grades.
As someone who works with students with tremendous skill
deficits, I cannot deny the importance of teaching fluency, decoding, and word
calling strategies. There is a reason that those skills are emphasized during students’
early years; it is the prime time to acquire language. However, critical
thinking skills such as predicting, questioning, visualizing, etc. are far more
hard-won than simply mastering reading fluency at a particular grade level. My
students (who are selected for a summer remediation program) can often
demonstrate small but important gains in word calling. Yes, this is easily demonstrable
and is motivating for my students. However, it takes them most of the summer (8
weeks of intense intervention) to master even two of three comprehension
strategies that they can use when they read. Moreover, almost all my students
require multiple demonstrations, repeated opportunities for practice in a
variety of groups, and many thinkalouds before they can apply it (at least
somewhat seamlessly) to their reading. All of these areas are addressed in the
Routman text. However, as a teacher, I found its sequence of skills to be especially
relevant. I have seen many lesson plans where strategies are taught in
isolation, heaped one upon the other, in the hopes that it will lead to
remarkable test scores at the end of the year. That rarely happens. Teaching
strategies are singular constructs are neither a good idea nor a profitable use
of time. Instead, helping students understand when to use those strategies, either by itself or in conjunction
with another strategy, will help students achieve proficiency as readers. This
is (at least in my opinion) is a self-perpetuating cycle. Confident readers are
far more willing to take risks than those who have no confidence in their
ability to read. Those are the types of readers we want our students to be.
I agree that it's vital we teach our kids when to use certain strategies, rather than just teaching them all in isolation. They need to build on one another.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you and with Jessica that it is important for us to ensure that the authentic process of reading is taken into consideration when teaching and when providing students with the invitation to apply strategies. When we read we rarely focus on one strategy. Reading is a complex, cognitive process that is strategic in nature and while we can work to try out new strategies we can't ignore the importance of improving the reader not just the specific reading skill.
ReplyDelete